Research pays off for top referees

Although I had 6 books for Christmas, they didn't include either of the two refereeing auto-
biographies that I expect many referees hoped to get in their stocking this year. 

Top of the list for most would have been The Rules of the Game by Pierluigi Collina, easily the most recognisable of referees with his bald head (result of illness; not the barber's razor) and goggling eyes and, in the estimation of many, the world's best referee.

We get many of this country's top referees come to talk to us here in Reading. People like Mark Hawsley, Steve Bennett, Steve Dunn and last year before he retired we had a captivating evening with David Elleray, considered by many to be England's finest. 

It may be remembered that David turned down a place at the 1998 World Cup where many felt he would have taken the final, because of his duties as Housemaster at Harrow School. We have also heard from Thatcham's Nationwide Football League duo, Paul Armstrong and lain Williamson.

They all mentioned that, without fail, they prepare before each match with a dossier on the teams and the individual players they are next refereeing. It has always concerned me that this might pre-
condition a referee's view of individual players. Give the dog a bad name and all that. However they all believe that this preparation is essential good refereeing.

As I said, I haven't got a copy of Collina's book and have to make do with extracts published in magazines and newspapers. One extract in The Guardian, in which he details his preparation for the England v Argentina contest in the last     World Cup, shows if anything, that he is perhaps even more thorough than his British colleagues.

For a referee, he says, an essential part of getting ready for a football match is research. For him this meant watching England and Argentina in action. Instead of going along to their matches he watched the games on television, studying how the teams played, the tactics they used both in attack and in defence. It is important, he said, to understand how the various moves are played out, to observe how they deal with set pieces such as free kicks and comers. 

He then moved on to an analysis of the individual players. For him, carrying out a game plan depends on the characteristics of the various players. But watching the games live was not enough so he videod each game. This he
felt was essential, as it enabled him to see all the moves repeatedly and allowed him to focus attention on the most important moments of the game. 

Research, Collina says, requires time and commitment but he is convinced that it pays
dividends in the long run. His preparation also runs to the stadium in which the match will be played. He always tries to have at least one training session at the ground especially if he has never been there before.

This enabled him to get to know the surroundings of the Sapporo Dome where the England -
Argentina game took place. The different smells and so on, as he put it. In this way he avoids being taken by surprise during the game itself or suffering the effects of disorientation. 

He said that with this testament to knowledge and study, he doesn't intend to suggest that without it, things are necessarily going to go badly. However he does recommend it as a guideline for life; try and minimise the element of luck in doing the best that you can.

For myself, I'm much more laid back, not worrying about a match until the morning of the game, and rather than prejudge players, take them as they come. This of course probably explains why I never got any further than the old Isthmian League and Pierluigi Collina refereed the World Cup Final.


Dick Sawdon Smith

 

 

Back To Contents

 

© R Sawdon Smith 2004